Skip to main content

When College isn't College, Part II

In follow-up to my earlier post When College isn't College.

I noticed on House the other night that Dr. Gregory House (the main character) made a comment about being the Dr. and making the diagnostic choices he was making because he "...went to college." WTF? In Canada all Dr. go to University for their degree.

Is "college" just the US'ism for Post Secondary Education in general?

Comments

Eric said…
Yup. In the US you'll commonly hear people say they're "going to college", even if the "college" is a university. If an American says "college degree", we in Canada would call it a university degree.
Barf said…
However, if ther're talking about being a doctor, that's effectively a third level degree. Or even a fourth.

This meaining (and I use the term 'year' loosely, as it is based on credits, not actual years):

4 years will get you a bachelor degree;
5/6 years will get you a masters degree;
7+ years will get you a doctorate degree (or PhD).

There are also degrees deemed "less than bachelor" that can be scored in just a couple years.

So when the dust settles, the reference to "college" may be singular, the degrees rewarded are not.
Thanks for trying to clear that up guys.

It's just one of those things that always boggled my mind.

If a Dr. here ever told me they had a "College Degree", my mind would immediately jump to "College Diploma" ... and I'd be outta that office lickety split. Thinking "WTF...Dr. spend 7+ years in UNIVERSITY [not college]."

At the same time if a Nurse told me they had a University Degree I'd be like .... "Don't nurses just do college courses?" (Though I've heard that's changing more and more in Canada ... but that's another story).

Lastly if you think of Comp Sci grads, putting a University Degree against a College Diploma is often a hard comparison. I know plenty of College grads I would much rather work with then University Comp Sci grads. Because I know the College people have actually gotten their hands dirty along the way, have probably done a co-op placement, and have learned actual application of knowledge not just "ya I read it and talked about it and I think I might be able to apply it." (Book 'smarts' [for lack of a better word])

Popular posts from this blog

Keyboard Shortcuts (Part II)

Continuing from my previous post on Keyboard Shortcuts : Windows Desktop/Explorer Window: F1 > Open Windows Help (Or active application help if you aren't on the desktop or in windows explorer) F2 > When you have a file selected F2 will take you into Rename mode F3 or WinKey + F > Open the find file or folder applet F5 > Refresh Window WinKey + M > Minimize All Windows WinKey + shift + M > Restore All Minimized Windows WinKey + D > Show Desktop WinKey + L > Lock Windows (Not available before WinXP) WinKey + E > Launch Windows Explorer WinKey + B > Set Focus to the TaskBar (dunno why you'd want to do this) WinKey + ctrl + F > Open the find computer applet shift + delete > Permanently remove a file (same as delete followed by empty trash) alt + tab > Cycles through your program list alt + shift + tab > Cycles backwards through your program list alt + space > Activate the window control menu (same as right clicking the icon in the top l

Keyboard Shortcuts (Part I)

People often notice that I don't use the mouse as much as most people. Personally I find it much quicker to do a lot of tasks using the keyboard. Therefore I've decided to post a list of keyboard shortcuts from time to time. Hopefully you'll enjoy them and and find them useful like I do. When editing text: ctrl + arrow (Left or Right) > Move the insertion point left or right entire words. ctrl + shift + arrow (Left or Right) > Highlight entire words (left or right of the insertion point). double click > Highlight an entire word. triple click > Highlight an entire line (not sentence). shift + home > Highlight from the insertion point to the start of the line. shift + end > Highlight from the insertion point to the end of the line.

VOTE for Firefox TLS 1.2 Support

As some of you may have heard TLS1.0 got some bad news/press recently. Various details: One , Two , and Three or check this Technical Paper (pdf) . So please go over here -> Firefox : Bug 480514 - Implement TLS 1.2 (RFC 5246) and VOTE! If you're really ambitious you could also go vote for TLS 1.1 implementation (for the sake of maximizing compatability with web servers): Firefox : Bug 565047 - Implement TLS 1.1 (RFC 4346)