Skip to main content

Something that perplexes me....

I just came across this bit about asteroid Apophis and the chances of it impacting earth.

"NASA scientists have recalculated the path of a large asteroid known as Apophis and now say it has only a very slim chance of banging into Earth.. The Apophis asteroid is approximately the size of two-and-a-half football fields, and updated computational techniques and newly available data indicate the probability of an Earth encounter on April 13, 2036 for Apophis has dropped from one-in-45,000 to about four-in-a million, NASA stated."

So here's the bit that rubs me wrong: "four-in-a million". Why not say "one-in-250,000". If the authors are really stuck on the whole "four-in" thing then they should have said four-in-180,000 to start with.

I really find inconsistencies like this baffling, I wish I knew the author and could understand what they hoped to gain by reporting the number in this way.

Comments

Barf said…
I'm with you on this one. My guess is they just wanted to use 'a million' to try to show high contrast to previous numbers.

I'd also argue that they've already blown their accountability by employing the 'football field' unit of measurement...
Anonymous said…
Well, I see it like this. To say "4 in a million", implies
it could happen 4 times in a million years which does
not mean every 250,000 years.
Reducing a ratio changes the meaning.
For example: If the ratio of boys to girls in a classroom is 20 to 15, you know there are 35 students
in the class. Reducing the ration implies there are
only 7 people in the class, which is not true.
I don't believe ratios should be treated as fractions.
Their use and meaning is different, or else why were
they invented?
@Herndon's Math House

That's an interesting take that I hadn't considered. However, considering the subject of the analysis hasn't changed I still fail to see the reason to change the scale between the two analysis.

I'd also argue that probability or chance isn't really a ratio. Unlike your class example where 20 to 15 implies a total of 35. one-in-45,000 or found-in-a-million do not means there are 45,001 chances or 4,000,004 chances that it might happen.

Also note 20-to-15 is applicable to a set of any multiple of 35. So a class of 70 could still have a ratio of 20-to-15.
GAH....can you tell I wasn't focusing when I posted that. Yes I typo'd "four-in-a-million" :(

Popular posts from this blog

Keyboard Shortcuts (Part II)

Continuing from my previous post on Keyboard Shortcuts : Windows Desktop/Explorer Window: F1 > Open Windows Help (Or active application help if you aren't on the desktop or in windows explorer) F2 > When you have a file selected F2 will take you into Rename mode F3 or WinKey + F > Open the find file or folder applet F5 > Refresh Window WinKey + M > Minimize All Windows WinKey + shift + M > Restore All Minimized Windows WinKey + D > Show Desktop WinKey + L > Lock Windows (Not available before WinXP) WinKey + E > Launch Windows Explorer WinKey + B > Set Focus to the TaskBar (dunno why you'd want to do this) WinKey + ctrl + F > Open the find computer applet shift + delete > Permanently remove a file (same as delete followed by empty trash) alt + tab > Cycles through your program list alt + shift + tab > Cycles backwards through your program list alt + space > Activate the window control menu (same as right clicking the icon in the top l

Keyboard Shortcuts (Part I)

People often notice that I don't use the mouse as much as most people. Personally I find it much quicker to do a lot of tasks using the keyboard. Therefore I've decided to post a list of keyboard shortcuts from time to time. Hopefully you'll enjoy them and and find them useful like I do. When editing text: ctrl + arrow (Left or Right) > Move the insertion point left or right entire words. ctrl + shift + arrow (Left or Right) > Highlight entire words (left or right of the insertion point). double click > Highlight an entire word. triple click > Highlight an entire line (not sentence). shift + home > Highlight from the insertion point to the start of the line. shift + end > Highlight from the insertion point to the end of the line.

VOTE for Firefox TLS 1.2 Support

As some of you may have heard TLS1.0 got some bad news/press recently. Various details: One , Two , and Three or check this Technical Paper (pdf) . So please go over here -> Firefox : Bug 480514 - Implement TLS 1.2 (RFC 5246) and VOTE! If you're really ambitious you could also go vote for TLS 1.1 implementation (for the sake of maximizing compatability with web servers): Firefox : Bug 565047 - Implement TLS 1.1 (RFC 4346)