Skip to main content

Life Experience Quiz

Caught this on another blog I read now and then and thought I'd take it myself.

It's slightly unfair as there are a few things that are in the "never gonna happen" category. From a UI design point of view I think they should give you the option of stating so and then have a section for standard results (as seen in the first few lines below) and a section refined results (based on the "never gonna happen" selections you made). But that's just me.
(Say there were 10 things that fell into my "never gonna happen" set, that'd mean I'd actually score closer to 55%).

The Life Experience Test

Overall, you have partaken in 87 out of 169 possible life experiences.
Your average life experience score is therefore 51%.


The average score is 51%, making your experiences more than 46% of the people who have taken this test.
The average for your age group (26-35) is 53%.

Broken down by category:
Art: 6/17 (35%)
Career & Work: 7/13 (54%)
Civics & Technology: 5/7 (71%)
Crime & Disarray: 4/11 (36%)
Education: 12/18 (67%)
Fashion: 6/10 (60%)
Fitness, Health and Sports: 2/7 (29%)
Life in General: 9/14 (64%)
Relationships: 12/14 (86%)
Religion & Politics: 2/4 (50%)
Social: 14/22 (64%)
Travel: 4/20 (20%)
Vices: 4/12 (33%)
 
Take the test and see how YOU compare

Comments

Evolving Squid said…
Overall, you have partaken in 98 out of 169 possible life experiences.
Your average life experience score is therefore 58%.


The average score is 50%, making your experiences more than 71% of the people who have taken this test.
The average for your age group (36-55) is 56%.

Broken down by category:
Art: 3/17 (18%)
Career & Work: 10/13 (77%)
Civics & Technology: 5/7 (71%)
Crime & Disarray: 9/11 (82%)
Education: 12/18 (67%)
Fashion: 5/10 (50%)
Fitness, Health and Sports: 3/7 (43%)
Life in General: 7/14 (50%)
Relationships: 9/14 (64%)
Religion & Politics: 2/4 (50%)
Social: 13/22 (59%)
Travel: 12/20 (60%)
Vices: 8/12 (67%)

Popular posts from this blog

Something that perplexes me....

I just came across this bit about asteroid Apophis and the chances of it impacting earth . "NASA scientists have recalculated the path of a large asteroid known as Apophis and now say it has only a very slim chance of banging into Earth.. The Apophis asteroid is approximately the size of two-and-a-half football fields, and updated computational techniques and newly available data indicate the probability of an Earth encounter on April 13, 2036 for Apophis has dropped from one-in-45,000 to about four-in-a million, NASA stated." So here's the bit that rubs me wrong: "four-in-a million". Why not say "one-in-250,000". If the authors are really stuck on the whole "four-in" thing then they should have said four-in-180,000 to start with. I really find inconsistencies like this baffling, I wish I knew the author and could understand what they hoped to gain by reporting the number in this way.

Coming to a flight near you....."What to do when your aircraft is hit by flaming space junk"

And you always thought flying was the most safe form of travel. "'The pilot of a Lan Chile Airbus A340 ... notified air traffic controllers at Auckland Oceanic Centre after seeing flaming space junk hurtling across the sky just five nautical miles in front of and behind his plane...'" Space Debris Narrowly Misses Airliner That's just messed up, I mean I knew that space junk posed a threat for our satellites, rockets, the shuttle, ISS, etc but having to worry about it entering the atmosphere just sucks. I mean yay one less thing for our extra-atmospheric endeavors to collide with but still messed up. I wonder if my house insurance covers "impact from flaming space debris". I know I get most bizarre "act of god" type things but that's pushing it.

Techno-Idiots (Part 1)

Yes this is part one, I don't have a plan for Part 2 but based on the things I've encountered in this world I CAN NOT fathom that I won't come up with something else. So I ran across this "Zune Team Getting Amnesty for iPod Use" article on slashdot. Following the obvious set of links . The comments on the Flickr photo page just amazed me. By Flickr user ariel_waldman: "I wonder how many iPods Zune bought to make a marketing point. Notice how all the iPods in there are the same generation." WoW! Did she even read the story? Zune is a product, an in-animate object it can not possibly purchase anything. How could someone claim to be such a fan of Apple's iPod (see her other comments) and have NFC that Zune is a Microsoft product meant to compete with Apple's iPod. Hey Ariel has your iPod made any purchases lately? /sigh I know that in the grand scope of things this is a minor grammatical issue but seriously people, at least engage part of your bra...